Neat there is an Orange Shuffle and it has a Local Web 2.0 Application innit.
When I compare the meetings I've had downunder January 2007 and compare to same time 2006, they may well be the same meet and greet/kick off type hodowns, but for this local market : (Structured) "user generated content" is right in the sweet spot of the growth plans. (vs last year u were escorted out of the building by security - "Who are you here with Sir"; "I'm down with UGC bro. " - shoutout to the hilltophoods;)
And for most businesses it's a new brand, outsourced development, low-ish budget and thus achievable. (internal teams and legacy 1.0 technology means new projects are very hard to develop inside the organisation, heck its why i started a business in the first place, that and....) Reading Jeff Jarvis' great material from Davos07 makes me wonder what is next, if the current stage media is going through is the "myspace-ization" of their businesses/brands and "reader-reporters".
BuzzMachine : "I remain concerned about the lack of innovation in the news business. Too much of the discussion was a rehash of what we’ve heard before: blogs v. msm, print v. online, falling news budgets, objectivity, professionalism in journalism. Insert scream sound-effect here. This was the year when big, old media realized there is no going back — in the year of the collapse of Knight Ridder and Tribune, they realize that there but for the grace of a stockholder or two so they go. But too many of them haven’t yet realized that the only path out of this is brave, bold, strategic innovation. They can’t even buy the new kids anymore because the kids are worth more than $1.5 billion. I still heard too much argument and depression when what we should be seeing is cooperation and optimism. If I had any message at Davos, that was it."
And then you have Fred Wilson's 3 minute take on Web 2.0, and this also makes a great list which those in local markets can easily turn into a "pitch" / "education" / "evangelism" session on product development for Web 2.0. It's a great checklist skewed to folksonomy. I'd probably add in some more about users being able to customise/control the content they create and how it can be syndicated/embedded.
A VC's 3 Minute Web 2.0 Product Checklist
1) Making online content default to public instead of private creates community
2) Every web service needs to have a profile for every user
3) Users should be encouraged to comment on other user's posts
4) Tagging content is better than foldering content and the tags should be public
5) Users should be encouraged to tag their content when it is posted to the service
6) Widgets should be used to make content available off of the service
7) Content on the service should be "bloggable" with one click
8) Engagement metrics like comments, favorites, views, can and should be used to drive discovery (the most interesting algorithm)
9) Geotagging is great but we've yet to see a great interface for geotagging
10) Machine tagging (autotagging) is the next big thing in web 2.0
OK back to work here with one more soundbite from The Jarvis@Davos to which I'd preface that not everywhere is as advanced as the Valley and gulches, so traditional media brands do have the catchup time - but they need to move beyond blog comments and start providing the tools to their "reader-reporters" (a definition reported by Jeff from a media co' which i quite like) and aggregated, searchable communities. neat there is an Orange Shuffle and I won't even distract further on the sexpresso trend ravaging Seattle - I'm sure this bby barista trend will come downunder in 2-3 years as well.
BuzzMachine : "Every mogul wants a social network like Rupert’s; media people kept begging for clues about how to build social webs about and around their stuff. One of the young moguls at Davos said that media properties are not meant to be social networks. I’ll disagree somewhat: The sad thing is that old media don’t realize that if they had just opened up years ago, they’d have seen that they already had social networks. I tell magazine people that they have communities gathering around the good stuff they create or find that we all like; newspapers have local communities. But because they were closed castles that kept their communities outside, they didn’t realize this. And so the people outside have gone to build their own social structures — which they clearly always wanted — now that they can. Too late for the big, old guys? Maybe."


































