Everyone knows WeblogsInc bought by AOL for $20M-$35M
Jeff also has some great notes on VC session for Web 2.0
: Exit is M&A and not IPO, because of the limited appetite of the public market and Sarbanes Oxley issues
A: Steve makes the point that IPOs will only make sense for the top winners in VC portfolios, where returns will be spectacular. It should be targeted as a goal, being open to listen to the right “take-out” opportunities as they come.
Q: Why should a company take VC money if they are already cash flow positive ? Isn’t a VC investment becoming an endorsement ?
Fred Wilson: “If you don’t need money, and you take it, you should be shot” (A: Fred mentions another type of deals where VC (or private equity) funds buy out a portion of founders equity.)
Q: There is a gap between Angels investing and VCs that is growing because of limited requirements of Web 2.0 companies. This has created a need for an incubator/early stage fund that VC firms could contribute to ?
A: Ross suggests that one of the ways would be to allow VC partners to invest their personal capital. Fred mentions that an early stage VC fund has been created for that purpose. Steve explains that there are limitations due to their own limited partnership agreements (and the need to avoid Double fee, Double carry).
<< Home